Pages

Monday, May 1, 2023

The Place Between

I haven’t reviewed a book on here for quite some time, but I finished one yesterday that I absolutely loved. It started out a little slow, but I think it had a good reason. By the time I finished it, I didn’t want it to be over. The book is The Place Between by Kit Oliver. I’d never read anything by Kit Oliver before, but it was included in Audible’s Plus Catalog, which means with my subscription, I could listen for free. After reading the description, I knew I wanted to read it. Here’s what the blurb said:

Will Ned finally get a relationship right - even if it's fake?

 

Ned’s exhausted from his divorce, single parenting, and graduate school, so when his boss comes up with a plan to 'improve' work-life balance, Ned wants no part of it.

 

But Dr. Charles Henry Abbot, Ph.D., has other ideas. Once Ned’s least favorite professor and now his infuriating colleague, Ned needs Abbot’s help editing his dissertation. With their newly limited work schedules, Abbot suggests the worst idea Ned’s ever heard: pretend to date. Convince their co-workers – and their boss – that they’re in a relationship and nailing this whole personal life thing . . . and each other. 

 

It’s an awful idea, but if it means a graduation cap, would faking a relationship be worth it so Ned can finish his degree and move home to his daughter?

 

The Place Between is a steamy, m/m romance novel. If you like enemies to lovers, fake dating, and the thin line between bickering and flirting, then you’ll love this fast-paced romance.

 

Buy The Place Between to watch Ned and Abbot’s fake relationship unfold as they stumble into the most real thing either of them has ever done. 

First, I like the fake relationship to lovers genre of m/m romance. Boyfriend Material by Alexis Hall and Love Happens Anyway (A Fake Boyfriend for Christmas Story) by RJ Scott are two of my favorites. I have listened to Boyfriend Material at least twice, and I have listened to Love Happens Anyway every Christmas since I first read it. Usually, my friend Susan suggests m/m romance books to read, and she’s an excellent judge of a good book. There are times that I have liked a book that she didn’t, but rarely (if ever) have I not liked a book she recommended to me.

 

Anyway, I don’t want to give too much away about The Place Between, but I do want to tell you about one scene that really hit home for me, and Oliver describes it in such real detail that I wonder if he has experienced something similar himself. In the book, Ned defends his dissertation (I’m not giving anything away; it was bound to happen in the book). When he walks out of his defense, he’s a bundle of nerves. He second-guesses himself and feels like he’s going to vomit any minute. While I never defended my dissertation because I never finished it, I did take the comprehensive exams for my Ph.D.: four days of written essays and two hours of an oral exam. The professors on my committee could ask me anything, and while I knew I had done very well on the written exams (one professor told me that she’d heard they were the best any of the professors on my committee had read), the oral exams were a different story.

 

When I was in graduate school, I was not a very confident person. I hated speaking in front of professors. I could speak to a classroom of students, but when it came to professors, I always felt like I couldn’t put together a coherent sentence. It wasn’t true, and I wish someone had told me that back then and encouraged me more, but no one did. Sadly, it’s not the way graduate school often works. I am far more confident now, and doctorate or not, I have no problem talking in front of professors and teaching their classes. But back then was a completely different story. I stuttered and stammered through my oral exams. It was beyond awful, though I found out later that they thought I’d done fine. They had decided after reading my written exams that I’d pass no matter what, so the oral exams were just a formality. I knew most of the answers I was asked during the oral exams, with the exception of one question from the Europeanist on my committee, but I don’t feel bad about that since the Americanists all apparently said afterward, “What the fuck was she talking about?”

 

Anyway, when I walked out of that conference room after that oral exam and knew the professors who’d just grilled me with questions were determining my fate, I was a mess. My friend Tony said that I was white as a ghost, and he was worried I’d either pass out or throw up. Luckily, I did neither, and shortly afterward, they called me back in. Apparently, they had been talking about other things since they’d decided my fate before I went into the oral exams. I knew I had to sit one on one with another professor for the women’s history portion of my oral exams (she was not able to make it up on the day of my exam). I was not too worried. We sat and had coffee while she asked me questions, and it went much more smoothly.

 

So the scene when Ned defends his dissertation is one that really resonated with me. I really did love the book. I usually listen to books only in my car, but this one I spent yesterday listening to because I just couldn’t stop myself, and I was sad when I finished it. Reading this book, I laughed, and at times, I even got a little teary-eyed. I felt a whole range of emotions reading this book, and for me, that’s always a mark of a great writer. The only drawback to the audiobook is the way the narrator voices Abbot. Though it fits with the character somewhat, I think the voice was just too monotoned and unemotional. Otherwise, I think Jeremy Frazier, the book's narrator, does an excellent job. At 12 hours and 55 minutes, it’s a long audiobook, but if you are like me, you will not want it to end.

 

If the book sounds interesting to you, I hope you will either read or listen to it. It’s available in Audible Plus and Kindle Unlimited. Also, there is a short coda (or extra chapter) to download when you finish the book. 


⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️


4 comments:

  1. On Amazon : 888 notes and 4,5/5 of average

    ReplyDelete
  2. Interestingly, uvdp, the reviews pretty much align with how I felt, though I have a few disagreements. One reviewer was an academic who, while enjoying the book, took issue with some of the descriptions of academia. As someone who has also been in higher education for more than 25 years, I agree there were a few things that might not have rang true, but it is fiction, so the author naturally took some artistic license, but I found that a lot of it did ring true from my experience. The one- and two-star reviews were more about the condition of the book than the contents of the book. Also, as I said in my review, the book is a little slow in the beginning, but after finishing the book, I feel it was necessary to develop the characters and set the tone of the book. Also, 4.5/5 with 926 ratings/reviews is pretty damn good. I highly recommend it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Joe, did you ever consider later going back to university to finish your dissertation or is it stale dated now? I would still suggest you consider it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wes, I have considered it. I wish the University of Vermont had a Ph.D. in history program, but they don't, and there isn't one nearby. There are a few in Montreal, and at least one that is even an English-speaking university, and the other closest is, I believe, at the University of Albany. However much I'd like to finish my doctorate, I doubt I'd ever do it. I don't want to teach full-time anymore. I really love what I do, and as long as I am where I am, I don't need it. If I were to leave for a larger museum in an area with doctoral programs in history, I'd more seriously consider it. Right now, I don't need the added anxiety, nor do I have the time. Also, because it's been nearly 15 years, my old credits would not transfer, and I'd be starting all over again from the beginning. Only my M.A. would carry over to a Ph.D. program.

    As for whether may dissertation is stale-dated now, I don't believe it is. I believe it is as relevant as ever, and no one else has ever written on the subject. Plus, I know so much more now than I did not know back then. I think I could make it even better than it was in the first draft (which was only half a dissertation).

    So, to say I have considered it would be an understatement. I've put a lot of thought into it over the years. It used to be a source of great sadness that I never finished, but things happen for a reason. I finally realize that I wouldn't have a job I love so much if I had gotten my Ph.D. I'd probably be teaching the same intro classes over and over at a community college somewhere and be absolutely miserable. I like working in the museum field more than I ever did teaching, and I still get to do some teaching. I just no longer have to do the grading, which was the part I always hated the most.

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for commenting. I always want to know what you have to say. However, I have a few rules:
1. Always be kind and considerate to others.
2. Do not degrade other people's way of thinking.
3. I have the right to refuse or remove any comment I deem inappropriate.
4. If you comment on a post that was published over 14 days ago, it will not post immediately. Those comments are set for moderation. If it doesn't break the above rules, it will post.